graph neural network
Mean-field theory of graph neural networks in graph partitioning
A theoretical performance analysis of the graph neural network (GNN) is presented. For classification tasks, the neural network approach has the advantage in terms of flexibility that it can be employed in a data-driven manner, whereas Bayesian inference requires the assumption of a specific model. A fundamental question is then whether GNN has a high accuracy in addition to this flexibility. Moreover, whether the achieved performance is predominately a result of the backpropagation or the architecture itself is a matter of considerable interest. To gain a better insight into these questions, a mean-field theory of a minimal GNN architecture is developed for the graph partitioning problem. This demonstrates a good agreement with numerical experiments.
Semi-Supervised Learning on Graphs using Graph Neural Networks
Chen, Juntong, Donnat, Claire, Klopp, Olga, Schmidt-Hieber, Johannes
Graph neural networks (GNNs) work remarkably well in semi-supervised node regression, yet a rigorous theory explaining when and why they succeed remains lacking. To address this gap, we study an aggregate-and-readout model that encompasses several common message passing architectures: node features are first propagated over the graph then mapped to responses via a nonlinear function. For least-squares estimation over GNNs with linear graph convolutions and a deep ReLU readout, we prove a sharp non-asymptotic risk bound that separates approximation, stochastic, and optimization errors. The bound makes explicit how performance scales with the fraction of labeled nodes and graph-induced dependence. Approximation guarantees are further derived for graph-smoothing followed by smooth nonlinear readouts, yielding convergence rates that recover classical nonparametric behavior under full supervision while characterizing performance when labels are scarce. Numerical experiments validate our theory, providing a systematic framework for understanding GNN performance and limitations.
- Asia > China > Fujian Province > Xiamen (0.40)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.05)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Evanston (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > Hungary > Budapest > Budapest (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Asia > China > Liaoning Province > Dalian (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Pasadena (0.04)
- Europe > Denmark (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Europe > Austria (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Europe > Hungary > Hajdú-Bihar County > Debrecen (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.05)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)